FreeRTOS Windows Simulator For Visual Studio or Eclipse and MingW
This page presents a Windows simulator port layer for FreeRTOS that has been developed and
tested using both Visual Studio 2010 Express edition
and the Eclipse IDE for C and C++ Developers
with the MingW GCC based compiler.
Demo projects are provided for both tool chains. Both tool chains are also free,
although Visual Studio Express must be registered if it is to be used for anything
other than evaluation purposes.
The port was developed on a dual
core Intel processor running 32 bit Windows XP.
Downloading the source files
From FreeRTOS V6.1.1 the official Windows simulator projects have been included
in the main FreeRTOS zip file download.
Notes on using the Windows FreeRTOS simulator
Please read all the following points before using this RTOS port.
The Windows port layer creates a low priority Windows thread for each FreeRTOS task created
by the simulated FreeRTOS application. All the low priority Windows threads are then kept
in the suspended state, other than the Windows thread that is running the FreeRTOS
task selected by the FreeRTOS scheduler to be in the Running state. In this way, the FreeRTOS
scheduler chooses which low priority Windows thread to run in accordance with
its scheduling policy. All the other low priority windows threads cannot run because they are suspended.
Real FreeRTOS ports that run on microcontrollers have to perform complex context
switching to save and restore the microcontroller context (registers, etc.) as
tasks enter and leave the Running state. In contrast, the Windows simulator
layer simply has to suspend and resume Windows threads as the tasks they represent
enter and leave the Running state. The real context switching is left to Windows.
Simulating the tick interrupt
The tick interrupt generation is simulated by a high priority Windows thread that will
periodically pre-empt the low priority threads that are running tasks. The tick
rate achievable is limited by the Windows system clock, which in normal FreeRTOS
terms is very slow and has a very low precision. True real time behaviour cannot
therefore be obtained.
Simulating interrupt processing
Simulated interrupt processing is performed by a second higher priority Windows
thread that, because of its priority, can also pre-empt the low priority threads
that are running FreeRTOS tasks. The thread that simulates interrupt processing
waits until it is informed by another thread in the system that there is an
interrupt pending. For example the thread that simulates the generation of tick
interrupts sets an interrupt pending bit, and then informs the Windows thread
that simulates interrupts being processed that an interrupt is pending. The simulated
interrupt processing thread will then execute and look at all the possible interrupt pending bits
- performing any simulated interrupt processing and clearing interrupt pending bits as necessary.
Before using the provided Windows projects, please be aware that I (the authour
of the Windows simulator) am an embedded programmer, am not a Windows programmer.
The implementation may be naive. For example, an assumption is made that destroying
a Windows process will free up all the resources that were being used by the
threads that were running in that process. It might be that this is not
the right approach. Any feedback
provided on the current implementation by those more knowledgeable about Windows
programming would be gratefully received.
Deleting tasks on Windows 2000 and Windows XP hosts
When a FreeRTOS task is deleted, the Windows simulator will terminate the thread that
was responsible for running the task. However, under both the Windows 2000 and
Windows XP operating systems, terminating a thread will not cause the
resources that were being used by the thread to be returned to the system. This
means that at run time there is a limit to the number of times the FreeRTOS
vTaskDelete() API function can be called. The limit is very high (many thousands),
but does prevent the standard demo 'death'
tasks from executing for more than a few minutes before the demo tasks start to
report errors. For this reason the standard demo 'death' tasks are not included
in the Windows simulator demo project.
Load on the CPU of the host Windows machine
The load on the CPU of the host Windows machine will be very high while a
FreeRTOS application is being simulated. Responsiveness should not be too
badly effected because only low priority threads are used, but the CPU core temperature
will rise and the CPU cooling fans will respond accordingly.
If you are in any way concerned about the ability of your
computer to cope with the high temperatures generated then I would suggest the
use of a utility that provides information on both the current CPU core temperature,
and how close the current temperature is to the maximum temperature rating of your
particular CPU. Personally I use the free
utility for this purpose.
The Eclipse project for the FreeRTOS simulator demo application
is located in the FreeRTOS/Demo/WIN32-MingW directory of the main
FreeRTOS download. This needs to be imported into the Eclipse workspace in order
to build the project.
Visual Studio 2010 Express
The Visual Studio solution for the FreeRTOS simulator demo application
is called WIN32.sln and is located in the FreeRTOS/Demo/WIN32-MSVN
directory of the main FreeRTOS download.
The provided demo application is very comprehensive and creates more than 30 demo
tasks before starting the scheduler. The tasks consist mainly of the
standard demo tasks - which
don't perform any particular functionality other than testing the port
and demonstrating how the FreeRTOS API can be used.
The 'check' task
The demo creates a 'check' task in addition to the standard demo tasks. This
only executes every (simulated) five seconds but has the highest priority to
ensure it gets processing time. Its main function is to check that all the
standard demo tasks are still operational.
The check task maintains a status string that is output to the console each time
it executes. If all the standard demo tasks are running without error then the
string will print out "OK" and the current tick count. If an error has been detected
then the string will print out a message that indicates in which task the error
Viewing the console output in Eclipse
The eclipse project will output strings to an integrated console. To view these
strings the "RTOSDemo.exe" console must be selected using the drop down list
accessible from the little computer monitor icon speed button - as shown in the
The Visual Studio console output will appear in a command prompt window.
Selecting the "RTOSDemo.exe" console during an Eclipse debug session
Defining a handler for a simulated interrupt service routine
Interrupt service routines must have the following prototype:
unsigned long ulInterruptName( void );
where 'ulInterruptName' can be any appropriate function name.
If executing the routine should result in a context switch then the interrupt
function must return pdTRUE. Otherwise the interrupt function should return
Installing a handler for a simulated interrupt service routine
Handlers for simulated interrupt service routines can be installed using the
vPortSetInterruptHandler() function which is defined in the Win32
port layer. This has the prototype shown below:
void vPortSetInterruptHandler( unsigned long ulInterruptNumber, unsigned long (*pvHandler)( void ) );
ulInterruptNumber must be a value in the range 3 to 31 inclusive and be
unique within the application (meaning a total of 29 simulated interrupts
can be defined in any application). Numbers
0 to 2 inclusive are used by the simulator itself.
pvHandler should point to the handler function for the interrupt number
Triggering a simulated interrupt service routine
Interrupts can be set pending and, if appropriate, executed by calling the
vPortGenerateSimulatedInterrupt() function, which is also defined as part
of the Win32 port layer. It has the prototype shown below:
void vPortGenerateSimulatedInterrupt( unsigned long ulInterruptNumber );
ulInterruptNumber is the number of the interrupt that is to be set pending, and
corresponds to the ulInterruptNumber parameter of vPortSetInterruptHandler().
An example of installing and triggering an interrupt
The simulator itself uses three interrupts, one for a task yield, one for the
simulated tick, and one for terminating a Windows thread that was executing a FreeRTOS
task that has since been deleted. As a simple example, shown below is the code
for the yield interrupt.
The interrupt function does nothing other than request a context switch, so
just returns pdTRUE. It is defined using the following code:
static unsigned long prvProcessYieldInterrupt( void )
/* There is no processing to do here, this interrupt is just used to cause
a context switch, so it simply returns pdTRUE. */
The simulated interrupt handler function is then installed using the following call,
where portINTERRUPT_YIELD is defined as 2:
Copyright (C) 2004-2010 Richard Barry. Copyright (C) 2010-2013 Real Time Engineers Ltd.
Any and all data, files, source code, html content and documentation included in the FreeRTOSTM distribution or available on this site are the exclusive property of Real Time Engineers Ltd..
See the files license.txt (included in the distribution) and this copyright notice for more information. FreeRTOSTM and FreeRTOS.orgTM are trade marks of Real Time Engineers Ltd.