Quality RTOS & Embedded Software

 Real time embedded FreeRTOS RSS feed 
Real time embedded FreeRTOS mailing list 
Quick Start Supported MCUs PDF Books Trace Tools Ecosystem TCP & FAT Training


Naked attribute in gcc

Posted by https://www.google.com/accounts on April 27, 2010
GCC documentation (http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Function-Attributes.html) states in 6.29 Declaring Attributes of Functions


Use this attribute on the ARM, AVR, IP2K, RX and SPU ports to indicate that the specified function does not need prologue/epilogue sequences generated by the compiler. It is up to the programmer to provide these sequences. The only statements that can be safely included in naked functions are asm statements that do not have operands. All other statements, including declarations of local variables, if statements, and so forth, should be avoided. Naked functions should be used to implement the body of an assembly function, while allowing the compiler to construct the requisite function declaration for the assembler."

In the source of FreeRTOS for AVR I have seen the following:
 void vPortYield( void ) attribute ( ( naked ) );
void vPortYield( void ) {
asm volatile ( "ret" ); }

portSAVE_CONTEXT() and portRESTORE_CONTEXT() are macroses with asm but vTaskSwitchContext is a function

My question is: Is the port for AVR of FreeRTOS is correct, or did I miss something?

RE: Naked attribute in gcc

Posted by Richard on April 27, 2010
I presume your point is "the naked function makes a C function call, but the GCC manual says you should only use asm statements". If so, then you are correct that in this case it goes against the advice, but it works fine, as far as I am aware, at all optimisation levels. In some ARM ports certain versions of GCC require the C function call to be replaced with a single asm statement that does exactly the same thing, but I have never known this to be the case with the AVR.

Are you having a problem with the generated code?


RE: Naked attribute in gcc

Posted by https://www.google.com/accounts on April 27, 2010
Thank you for the answer.

No. I have not problem with the generated code.

My aim was to clarify my understanding of naked functions in GCC.

[ Back to the top ]    [ About FreeRTOS ]    [ Sitemap ]    [ ]

Copyright (C) 2004-2010 Richard Barry. Copyright (C) 2010-2016 Real Time Engineers Ltd.
Any and all data, files, source code, html content and documentation included in the FreeRTOSTM distribution or available on this site are the exclusive property of Real Time Engineers Ltd.. See the files license.txt (included in the distribution) and this copyright notice for more information. FreeRTOSTM and FreeRTOS.orgTM are trade marks of Real Time Engineers Ltd.

Latest News:

FreeRTOS V9.0.0 is now available for download.

Free TCP/IP and file system demos for the RTOS

Sponsored Links

⇓ Now With No Code Size Limit! ⇓
⇑ Free Download Without Registering ⇑

FreeRTOS Partners

ARM Connected RTOS partner for all ARM microcontroller cores

Renesas Electronics Gold Alliance RTOS Partner.jpg

Microchip Premier RTOS Partner

RTOS partner of NXP for all NXP ARM microcontrollers

Atmel RTOS partner supporting ARM Cortex-M3 and AVR32 microcontrollers

STMicro RTOS partner supporting ARM7, ARM Cortex-M3, ARM Cortex-M4 and ARM Cortex-M0

Xilinx Microblaze and Zynq partner

Silicon Labs low power RTOS partner

Altera RTOS partner for Nios II and Cortex-A9 SoC

Freescale Alliance RTOS Member supporting ARM and ColdFire microcontrollers

Infineon ARM Cortex-M microcontrollers

Texas Instruments MCU Developer Network RTOS partner for ARM and MSP430 microcontrollers

Cypress RTOS partner supporting ARM Cortex-M3

Fujitsu RTOS partner supporting ARM Cortex-M3 and FM3

Microsemi (previously Actel) RTOS partner supporting ARM Cortex-M3

Atollic Partner

IAR Partner

Keil ARM Partner

Embedded Artists