Quality RTOS & Embedded Software

 Real time embedded FreeRTOS RSS feed 
Real time embedded FreeRTOS mailing list 
Quick Start Supported MCUs PDF Books Trace Tools Ecosystem TCP & FAT Training




Loading

Microchip AN1264 not using mutex

Posted by on June 24, 2011
Hi!

I am just wondering if there is any specific reason or advantage for using binary semaphores instead of mutexes in AN1264 from Microchip. In most cases I think a mutex would be more appropriate.

Regards,
Anguel

RE: Microchip AN1264 not using mutex

Posted by Richard on June 24, 2011
I am not the application note author, so can only speculate. If the semaphores are used for mutual exclusion, then it might be better to use a mutex, I would agree. The only real difference between the two is that a mutex includes a basic priority inheritance mechanism, whereas binary semaphores don't.

Regards.

RE: Microchip AN1264 not using mutex

Posted by Richard Damon on June 24, 2011
My guess, based on the fact that while they are using FreeRTOS as the example, they also want to be as general as possible, would be that since a Semaphore is a simpler object, and is available in more RTOSes than a mutex, it makes there example more generic. A Mutex is a Binary Semaphore with additional features to specialize it for mutual exclusion, which for FreeRTOS means adding priority inheritance.

Reading over their usage, a mutex really is the proper choice, as they are using them mutual exclusion on a resource, which is what mutexes were developed for.

RE: Microchip AN1264 not using mutex

Posted by on June 24, 2011
Thanks for the help! Portability looks like a good reason. Or maybe the application author simply used to use semaphores. As far as I know, mutexes were introduced later in FreeRTOS. Or could maybe memory usage or performance be also a reason for his choice?


[ Back to the top ]    [ About FreeRTOS ]    [ Sitemap ]    [ ]




Copyright (C) 2004-2010 Richard Barry. Copyright (C) 2010-2016 Real Time Engineers Ltd.
Any and all data, files, source code, html content and documentation included in the FreeRTOSTM distribution or available on this site are the exclusive property of Real Time Engineers Ltd.. See the files license.txt (included in the distribution) and this copyright notice for more information. FreeRTOSTM and FreeRTOS.orgTM are trade marks of Real Time Engineers Ltd.

Latest News:

FreeRTOS V9.0.0 is now available for download.


Free TCP/IP and file system demos for the RTOS


Sponsored Links

⇓ Now With No Code Size Limit! ⇓
⇑ Free Download Without Registering ⇑


FreeRTOS Partners

ARM Connected RTOS partner for all ARM microcontroller cores

Renesas Electronics Gold Alliance RTOS Partner.jpg

Microchip Premier RTOS Partner

RTOS partner of NXP for all NXP ARM microcontrollers

Atmel RTOS partner supporting ARM Cortex-M3 and AVR32 microcontrollers

STMicro RTOS partner supporting ARM7, ARM Cortex-M3, ARM Cortex-M4 and ARM Cortex-M0

Xilinx Microblaze and Zynq partner

Silicon Labs low power RTOS partner

Altera RTOS partner for Nios II and Cortex-A9 SoC

Freescale Alliance RTOS Member supporting ARM and ColdFire microcontrollers

Infineon ARM Cortex-M microcontrollers

Texas Instruments MCU Developer Network RTOS partner for ARM and MSP430 microcontrollers

Cypress RTOS partner supporting ARM Cortex-M3

Fujitsu RTOS partner supporting ARM Cortex-M3 and FM3

Microsemi (previously Actel) RTOS partner supporting ARM Cortex-M3

Atollic Partner

IAR Partner

Keil ARM Partner

Embedded Artists