Quality RTOS & Embedded Software

 Real time embedded FreeRTOS RSS feed 
Quick Start Supported MCUs PDF Books Trace Tools Ecosystem TCP & FAT




Loading

FreeRTOS on Microblaze - fast_interrupt vs interrupt_handler

Posted by npatel on January 3, 2017

I am working with microblaze and I can see the port is using the address 0x10 and one function to handle interrupts. This allows proper saving on stack etc. for the operating system.

If I wanted to use the fastinterrupt attribute, which simply jumps to the interrupt fuction instead of having to jump to 0x10 address, what do I have to do in the interrupt routine to allow for proper FreeRTOS compatibility. Would fastinterrupt method even be supported to run FreeRTOS?

The reason I am asking, is I can see in portasm.S the function "interrupthandler" is doing special saving and loading of stack, etc. Would I need to do this to support fast_interrupts?

Thanks in advance for all the help!


FreeRTOS on Microblaze - fast_interrupt vs interrupt_handler

Posted by rtel on January 4, 2017

I have never done this so I'm not really sure, but I suspect if your fast interrupt is not using the FreeRTOS API, or at least not attempting to perform a context switch, then you probably don't have to do anything (other than ensure whatever resources are needed by the fast interrupt are provided).


[ Back to the top ]    [ About FreeRTOS ]    [ Sitemap ]    [ ]




Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Latest News

FreeRTOS kernel V10 is available for immediate download. Now MIT licensed.


FreeRTOS Partners

ARM Connected RTOS partner for all ARM microcontroller cores

IAR Partner

Microchip Premier RTOS Partner

RTOS partner of NXP for all NXP ARM microcontrollers

STMicro RTOS partner supporting ARM7, ARM Cortex-M3, ARM Cortex-M4 and ARM Cortex-M0

Texas Instruments MCU Developer Network RTOS partner for ARM and MSP430 microcontrollers

OpenRTOS and SafeRTOS